Portland: as a list

Last week Jeff, Thomas Rickert, and I took a short trip to Portland, Oregon to indulge in the craft beer scene. After the jump, the trip, list style. Continue reading

Posted in Beer, Food, Travel | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Odds and ends WPA

WPA 2010 wrapped up this morning. I enjoyed the conference. It’s a good size: about three hundred people, I think. That’s big enough to see lots of fellow travelers, and small enough to have long conversations quite a few of them–which is the point of conferences, after all. Highlights:

  • Good sessions. I didn’t skip a single time slot. I enjoyed Bump Halbritter’s talk, which used Donald Murray to talk about what it means to be innovative (rather than just saying, hey, what I’m doing is innovative). The research project Shirley Rose, Barbara L’Eplattenier, and Lisa Mastrangelo, are starting looks fascinating–updating surveys about WPAs from the 1980s. Several interesting discussion sessions focusing on dual enrollment. And I was very interested in the MA in Teaching Writing Michelle Sidler and Elizabeth Woodsworth are developing at Auburn and Auburn Montgomery.
  • On the other hand: I went to (part of a) session which began with the presenter complaining about the hotel, apologizing for the poor quality of the talk, and distributing a handout which approached something completely different than the program. I suppose I should be used to this by now, but it still irks me. I left and found something better.
  • My panel, with Jeff and Joe Bizup, went well, and I had good follow-up conversations with John Brereton and Jim McDonald. More on that soon; I’ve got more ideas about the slow numbers we’re seeing at Western–given that many others are dealing with similar issues.
  • Time well spent with Susanmarie Harrington, Duane Roen, Chuck Paine, Charlie Lowe, and many others. I also met Dylan Dryer and Carra Lee Hood, both recently published in Composition Forum.
  • No running–I’m still resting my feet and hoping I don’t have a serious case of plantar fascitis. Until today, I’ve had no symptoms, but this morning my right foot is bugging me for no apparent reason. I rode a stat bike once, and I’m getting home early enough today to ride as well.
  • As usual, traveling with Jeff suits me. We both get up early, and we both like to eat. Thursday we headed to Monk’s Cafe right after we hit Philly. Mussels, belgians, sour ales, yum. We split veal sausage and duck sandwiches. Walking back to the hotel, I spotted a Russian River handle at Tria. It turned out to be Russian River Registration. Jeff nearly leapt over the bar. “We’ll take two!” Delicious.
  • Given that I seem to have survived eating red meat, I may have to try some more soon. It’s been a while.
  • Friday, the WPA organizers wisely skip hosting a meal, so everyone gets to enjoy the city. I went to Eulogy and Triumph with Jeff and Michael Day. Russian River Consecration at the former, and IPX, a good double IPA, at the latter.
  • We left the hotel this morning at 9.10am. Thirty minutes later, we were at the airport and through security. Wow.

Kudos to Linda Adler-Kassner, Eli Goldblatt, and the other CWPA folks involved; they did a fine job. I don’t remember hearing where next year’s conference is. But I expect to be there.

Posted in Beer, Composition, Food, Running, Travel | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Tag A tag cloud

Recently Jeff and I have been getting a lot of email about From A to <A>: Keywords of Markup, our edited collection from the University of Minnesota Press. Production is ramping up, and it’s time to think about proofing, indexing, and the like. And tag clouds!

Tag A tag cloud

Posted in Research | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Slow numbers

Alex writes about reconceptualizing general education at Buffalo. I’m thinking about general education as well, given the decline in enrollment in my department, and my upcoming WPA presentation about its implications for our writing program. For better or worse, WIU isn’t to the point of refactoring the whole gened process yet, and might never be, given the articulation infrastructure already in place in Illinois, and our embrace of the “2+2″ role for the university. Given that rising community college enrollment is a trend nationwide, even if it’s not yet possible to rethink gened as a whole, we need to ask hard questions about the center position of general education requirements in English & Journalism.

At least on the short term, declines in gened are a serious problem for us, since it makes up a large part of our coursework. I suspect that’s true of many English departments. The issue might press on my department a little more heavily than most since (a) we recently rewrote the English major to use 200-level geneds for much of the the required “core” of courses (changes not yet on the WIU web site), and (b) I’ve also heard many of our majors are recruited through general education. Though I’ve never seen any proof of the latter, obviously, if it’s true, gened declines would be doubly troubling, since we’d see cascading impacts in our 300 and 400 level literature and writing courses. (One indicator the “gened recruiting” hypothesis is not true: while our number of majors has declined in the past 10 years, the rate of decline hasn’t matched the loss in geneds we’ve seen.)

On the writing side, the numbers look like this. (I have similar numbers for literary studies, but only the past four years.) Here’s enrollment in our three comp courses expressed as a percentage of lower division undergraduates enrolled:

Comp enrollment 2001-2010

Comp enrollment 2001-2010

By semesters, from a high point of 50.2% in Fall 2002, we are at 43% in Spring 2010. A similar pattern emerges if we consider annual numbers: the headcounts for the last three years, respectively, were the lowest for any of the last ten. It will be very interesting to see if next year’s numbers continue this trend.

For me, the big takeaway is simply expressed: I think we can count on students taking more general education courses in community colleges. I’ve read some articulation agreements and the like this past week, and I don’t think we can do much to stop it. And the more I think about it, I’m unsure that’s the right response anyway. So we’ve got to diversify our roster of courses and strengthen the non-gened parts of our programs. I have a feeling that won’t be easy, though it may be less difficult for the writing side of the department than for literary studies.

Posted in Composition, Writing | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Okay

Something seems to be wrong. [Click] Ok.

Got this error message from Yahoo yesterday (see full size).

Posted in Whatever | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Work pays, I guess

On Wednesday we got a check for $802.11 from the US Treasury. Today we got the explanation from the IRS: I didn’t take the “Making Work Pay” tax credit on our 2009 tax return.

I have mixed feelings about taking this check. On the one hand, woo woo eight hundred bucks. On the other hand, we get enough tax credits already, in my opinion, and the government is beyond broke. I’m ashamed to say how low this credit pushes our rate of federal taxes. At least the amount of the check is funny.

Okay, I really need to stop doing our taxes now, and turn it over to a professional.

Posted in Whatever | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

tcpdump

tcpdump -A -i en1 -s0

Context:

I had some weblog problems this week, and needed to see what was happening when I was trying to log in.

Explanation:

  • -A outputs as ASCII
  • -s0 figures out the packet length automatically
  • -i en1 specifies the network interface, in this case en1 since I was using wireless not cable Ethernet

Run as root or use sudo.

Posted in Nerdliness, Shell tricks | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Madelyn’s computer time

Madelyn on the computer My brother’s eMac recently suffered a hard drive crash, and he sent me the machine after he upgraded to a new iMac–a move he really needed to make! With the hard drive from my old Linux box, and the memory from our recently deceased G5, we’ve got a nice computer for Madelyn: G4/1GHz, 2GB memory, 40GB hard drive, 17″ screen. It will probably end up in her room, since we really don’t have anywhere else to put it. These days, Madelyn is using our computers more and more adeptly. I’m eager to encourage this, but I don’t want her clicking her life away–if we allowed it, she’d play games on PBSKids.org all day long. Fortunately, Mac OS X has good parental controls built into the OS and core applications like Safari. While Apple has a video tutorial, I wanted to point out several of the ways we have used it.

First, we made accounts for Madelyn on each of our computers. I helped her pick an icon and desktop background on each machine. Erin and I have insisted that Madelyn use her accounts rather than walk up to any computer and start typing. She used to do that. But over time Madelyn has learned that she needs to switch “on her user,” and she changes 95% of the time. (Everybody uses their own accounts in our house–we even have one for the grandparents. All normal accounts have normal privileges; we use separate accounts for system administration.)

Using System Preferences, I turned on Parental Controls for Madelyn’s account. The first and most important item was time limits. More than once we’ve found Madelyn in her pajamas at the computer, up out of bed early in the morning or late at night. If the computer goes in her room, certainly, she’ll keep trying to use it all hours. So we disabled use after 9pm and before 8am. We also turned on the limits on amount of time per day.

Time limits

These limits work quite well. When the allotted time is almost up, a dialog is raised. Madelyn has learned to read it and will ask for more time. She hasn’t yet learned not to have a fit if we don’t agree to her request, but that’s another story…

Time almost up

I decided against using the “Simple Finder” without even looking at it. Not only do I have bad memories of “At Ease,” the venerable Mac-simplifer, but it seems counter-productive: why not just learn the real interface? Madelyn hasn’t fooled with many applications, so we haven’t done much with the specifics for Mail, iTunes, and other apps which can be controlled. But Safari is another story. We use the whitelist approach, using bookmarks to create a list of sites which Madelyn can visit. Sites can be added on the fly with our administrator username and password. Anything else is blocked.

As Madelyn gets more adept, she’ll get her own email account and other applications will come into play. We’ve talked about buying her a digital camera, too, given that she’s now asking to take pictures. Perhaps Flickr will follow.

Posted in Family, Nerdliness | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

When copyright goons attack

This week, litigious anti-competitive copyright goons* from the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) and the National Association of Music Publishers (NAMP) attacked the “extremist, radical anti-copyright agenda” of Creative Commons, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Public Knowledge, and other groups. (We can consider Canadian MP James Moore’s similar use of “radical extremist” as part of this attack, though he’s not a copyright goon, but one of their henchmen.) The talking points being circulated aren’t new (and many are quite tiresome) but the vitriol has been turned up to eleven. Don’t be surprised to see this continue.

NAMP’s president David Israelite ended his screed, “The New Enemy,” with a “top ten” list which he calls “the anti-copyright agenda.” I was gonna fisk it, but Mike Masnick beat me to it, and I doubt I could do any better. Have a look. As he points out, Israelite’s repeated choice of “enemy” is telling, and the evidence for the drastic action being proposed very thin. Gigi Sohn’s response to a similar rant in a fundraising letter from ASCAP also hits it right on the head–why are these groups obsessed with punishing file sharers and infringers? Why not focus on helping artists earn a living?

But despite the clear preference for compensation over punishment, groups that claim to represent artists like ASCAP continue, like their big corporate colleagues, to advocate for the latter, and seem completely bereft of ideas for promoting the former.  Why?  Probably because the old business model suits them just fine: they collect millions of dollars of royalties on behalf of captive musicians and (mostly) pay them.  In a digital world, Do It Yourself is the mantra, with Creative Commons being one of the tools that allows artists to do so.  Where does that leave middlemen like ASCAP?  Nowhere.

That Creative Commons would be objectionable dovetails with the compulsory licensing at the heart of ASCAP’s business model: how dare anyone opt out of our state-sponsored monopoly, or suggest that anyone else do so!

*No, this isn’t my typical argumentative approach. But it fits here. If they are going to characterize Creative Commons, EFF, etc. as “radical extremists”–a millimeter away from saying “anti-American terrorist”–then I get to play, too.

Update 7/14: Larry Lessig responds.

Posted in IP | 6 Comments

Forecast

Forecast

Lows in the fifties! A nice break from the rain/steambath alternation we’ve seen lately. Time to catch up on some yardwork.

Posted in Weather | Comments Off